Amy Chua wrote her infamous article “Why Chinese mothers are superior” and as the Tiger Mom she became the defining voice for White America of Chinese and Asian-American culture. I disgaree with universalizing the WMAF experience into somehow speaking for all Asians. I think WMAF speaks for WMAF. And the Tiger Mom experience specifically relates to how WMAF parents raise their Hapa kids. Likewise I wrote an article in 2011 “White moms love their children, Asian moms hate their Tiger Kids”. This article was likewise interpreted as applying
universalizing to all white and Asian women. Although I only intended it to apply to white and Asian moms raising Eurasian children. Obviously White Moms, married to Asian dads, and raising Hapa kids is a tiny minority, and can’t be considered typical of the white population.
However as a subgroup, I have noticed at least from polling my blog comments, that white moms actually care about the feelings of their Hapa sons, while Asian moms coolly dismiss it. A White dad from Halfsigma posting here, find something to praise in the Oriental female character, in her steely determination to ignore feelings, while the white mom embodied the decadence of the West, by caring about children’s emotions. As a person, I felt bad troubling these brave white women, who get enough hate for marrying the most despised race of men. But as an empiricist, this just added more data to my studies in the difference between WMAF and AMWF child-raising.
The complete and total failure of WMAF sons as a population is one of the most covered up stories in the world today. I don’t want to sound like a tinfoil hat conspiracist, but it really does seem like there was a deliberate disinfo campaign to use Keanu Reeves and Dean Cain Tanaka with their full white moms, as the posterboys for WMAF couples. Now all the dirty secrets about WMAF families are coming out, and WMAF couples are mad as hell about it, aggressively attacking any Hapa sons who speak out. WMAF is always bragging about how they are the richest, most common coupling. This is supposed to prove that they are normal nay superior. Lets accept these facts. The fact that wealth, education, and numbers has failed to produce a single Eurasian success story is a striking blow against them.
Poor Wilkes McDermid was a Eurasian son driven insane by the interracial dating disparity. In a way documenting the vast gulf between AMWF and WMAF sons is honoring Wilkes legacy. He was a Eurasian who made his public suicide driven into despair by the cruelty of his WMAF birth. Some people think its ridiculous to be driven to suicide by internet dating disparities. But if you are told your entire life your manhood is worthless, why live? If its not an official study, then you will just dismiss it as anecdotes. It has always been my impression, in spite of any official stats, that the WMAF to AMWF disparity was 100:1. I never actually counted. Wilkes McDermid actually counted, and invited his friends to come with him to count. The ratio he got was 99:1. I believe him. He is dead, he has no reason to lie. And his London observations match what I’ve seen personally in America. With a 100:1 advantage in population for WMAF, what does it mean that there is a 100:1 advantage for AMWF in celebrities and success stories? Does it mean that an AMWF son is 1000 times superior to a WMAF son?
Then these WMAF apologists will make excuses why its impossible to name a single success. They will claim there are so few WMAF couples around. So few Eurasians. Yeah, and other times they brag that they are the most common, most rich couple, to make themselves seem normal. With all that money and numbers you can’t make a single son of note? Only when naming success stories are WMAF numbers tiny. When all the deranged, criminal, psychotic Eurasians of the past year are named, then this is just a drop in the bucket out of the millions of millions of WMAF sons. When asked to name good WMAF Hapas, there are only a few hundred in the world apparently. And what about AMWF? If anyone is rare, tiny in numbers, it is AMWF. So why is it possible to name successful AMWF sons? My point is not to make a pissing contest between AMWF and WMAF sons. Rather this is evidence about how the abusive nature of the WMAF relationship dooms all WMAF sons to failure. The world needs to know this. It enrages me, that all this is going on in 2015 America, and the world turns a blind eye to it. Its a big deal what WMAF couples are doing to their Eurasian sons.
Why is it that white mothers are capable of loving their-half Asian sons, and identifying with their Asian issues, while Asian mothers, who are freaking Asian themselves, are unable to do this for their sons?
The dirty dark secrets of WMAF families could not be kept secret forever. Eurasian boys are all grown up now, and they are speaking out in record numbers. The momentum is growing. People are noticing.
I wish I could just have a neutral observer here, not a white or Asian, maybe a white woman or Black person. Someone with no skin in the game. Let them look at all the evidence and judge. Are we Eurasians crazy or do we have a case? IMHO any good faith neutral observer looking at the data, would have to concede we have a major Eurasian crisis on our hands. The more white men and Asian women attack their own children in public, the more their true ugliness is being displayed for the whole world to see.