At 1st glance this might seem like a very extreme and provocative statement. How can the son of a White male and Asian female, and a Caucasian female belong to completely different biological species? Understand that I’m not claiming anything very radical here. I’m not saying Hapa hybrids have gills or horns or anything. I’m speaking purely in evolutionary terms of sexual selection. In biological terms, speciation has occurred or is in the verge of occurring when mating between subspecies no longer occurs in the wild. Biologically the 2 species might still be able to mate and reproduce offspring. But the females of the race, will have no desire to choose to do so. Mating between the 2 can only occur under conditions of captivity or artificial experimentation.
I contend that this stage of speciation has already been reached between Eurasian men and Caucasian women. They are for all Darwinian purposes separate species. No mating has ever occurred in the wild, between the Hapa man and the White woman. They are by sociobiological definitions, 2 complete, separate species. There have been millions of Eurasian men born of WMAF starting with the military marriages of Japan, Korea, Vietnam and accelerating since the 1980s. And yet since 1945, there has NEVER been a SINGLE documented, verifiable case of a Eurasian man producing children with a white woman. Eurasian men are functionally sterile. They are hybrid mules. The evidence is too overwhelming for me to continue to believe this is merely a cultural trend. I now have no choice but to conclude that Eurasian men and White women are distinct species. Not only do they not mate in the wild, they most likely would not mate in captivity. If you put a white woman and Eurasian man in a Zoo cage to mate, the white woman would rather rip off the head of the Eurasian scum.
WMAF is the most common interracial pairing and over several decades the population of Hapa-American men has exploded into the millions. Its not like Eurasians live in isolated Hapatowns. They grow up among white women. And yet despite these facts there has never been a single documented example of a Eurasian man producing a child with a Caucasian woman.
Genetic evidence shows that European women interbred with Neanderthal men. And yet not a single white woman has ever chosen to mate with a Eurasian men. The only conclusion we can draw, is that the genetic distance is greater between Hapas and Whites, then between Neanderthals and Whites. A Neanderthal is a closer human relative than a Eurasian male.
Are Eurasian men human?
By the definitions of sexual selection, we must conclude, that they are not. That they are a totally different biological species from white women. This is no longer a sociological trend, this is sociobiology. It is no longer the accident of individual dating choices. At this point we have crossed the line into speciation. No Eurasian male has ever, in the history of the world, mated with a white woman in a state of nature. It is not even clear that Eurasian sperm has the ability to impregnate Caucasian eggs. Since sexual intercourse has never occurred, the answer could just as well be no. The mating of a Eurasian man and a white woman, is as much a hypothetical as a Humanzee.
I know these will be seen as extreme statements. But for any other species but human, if a neutral biologist looked at the facts, these are the conclusions he’d have to come to. If he learned that despite being in close immediate proximity, not a single Eurasian male and white female had ever mated, he would have to believe that these were 2 separate species. Or if not yet separate, at an advanced stage of speciation.
We are not talking about AMWF, where 95% of white women refuse to date Asian men. No we are talking about 100%. As in no white woman has ever mated with a Eurasian man. Note that the crossmating level would only have to be near 0, but not necessarily literally absolute 0 to meet the biological definition of speciation. But as far as has been proven, mating between White women and Eurasians is at absolute zero. There is a 0% rate of mating between Eurasians and Whites. 0 couples. The same rate as Humans and Chimpanzees. Despite the fact that sociologically the Eurasian man should have advantages over a pure Asian man or even an AMWF Hapa. He has a white last name after all. But no, it is the Hapas with Asian last names who are mating with white women.
The evidence is just too overwhelming. This is not a cultural trend. This is the splitting of races into species. Remember that the whole history of the Eurasian race is only 50 years. They are a totally new race, with no history. A race whose genes have never been tested by sexual or natural selection. For a totally new race like Hapas, the extreme conclusions, might very well be the right ones. White women do not consider Hapa men to be human males. And since it is sexual selection that creates species, this female choice, has created its own reality. For any species but humans, when 2 subspecies in close proximity have never voluntarily mated, speciation has occurred.
In sociobiological terms, Eurasian males can not be considered members of the species of homo sapiens. They are Homo Hapicus.